“Bryan and Jason,
I wanted to take the time to thank you and your staff for the hard work, time, and consideration you have put into our project. Your presentation today was as professional a job as I have seen. I must admit I was skeptical. My background in the golf course business and my experience with consultants performing feasibility studies has not been positive. I never saw a project that wasn’t feasible in their eyes and, needless to say, they were never anywhere to be found when the project did not perform up to their projections. And I never, ever had the experience I had today of a consultant say we were spending too much money on a project! What I have witnessed out of SFA is a group of guys that, more than having the “pizzazz” and “slicks” to sell any project you want, but instead having the integrity and honesty to give their clients the straight answers. I truly value that.”
Feasibility Studies Whether you are considering a community recreation center or a privately owned sports facility, your most important decisions – what to build, how much to build, where to build, what to offer, and how much to invest – each need to be evaluated with great care. This is where your feasibility study comes in.
These factors can lead to findings of “Feasibility: No.” Approximately 15% of our feasibility studies result in a finding of “Low” to “Poor” likelihood of success. In the instances where “Feasibility: No” is the finding, SFA will carefully outline the necessary measures that could raise the likelihood of success and recommend modifications or outright changes to such factors as location, business model, programming, and building/construction type, just to name a few. In many cases, a finding of “Feasibility: No” can be turned around with adjustments in location, business model, programming, and building/construction type. |
![]() |
© 2004-07 The Sports Facilities Advisory. All rights reserved. |
|



